Linkody is a solid link-verification tool: it re-checks your known backlinks daily and alerts you fast when one breaks. Linkwake solves a different problem — portfolio-scale movement across the entire open web graph, at a price where you monitor every client instead of choosing which ones you can afford.
Last checked:
Many agencies genuinely need both: Linkody-style daily verification for the links you're actively building, and Linkwake as the affordable portfolio-wide layer underneath. If your work is client reporting and prospecting rather than link-by-link verification, Linkwake alone may be all you need.
Try it without commitment: the free tier tracks 5 domains forever, and the free backlink checker works with no account at all.
Linkody monitors individual known links and says it updates their status every 24 hours. Linkwake compares domain-to-domain relationships between named Common Crawl graph releases. The products therefore answer different questions, and matching totals should not be expected.
You do not need a hard migration. Keep Linkody for placed-link verification, import the client and competitor domains you want to monitor broadly into Linkwake, and run both for one reporting cycle before deciding whether their roles overlap.
Choose Linkody when URL-level status, anchors, follow attributes, or daily checks are essential. Linkwake is slower and domain-level by design; it is strongest as a portfolio monitoring and competitor-research layer.
Competitor features and pricing change. These official sources were reviewed on July 13, 2026:
Not for every workflow. Linkody is better suited to frequent verification of known page-level links; Linkwake is built for broad portfolio movement and competitor gaps.
Yes. A practical split is Linkody for actively placed links and Linkwake for affordable coverage across every client and competitor.
They use different sources, scopes, and refresh models. Compare trends within each system rather than expecting identical totals.